Author Archives: FG


The Drift Of Hugo Rifkind Soraya Boyd & Clive Hambidge Poor Hugo Rifkind has been drifting lately. He has said so much in an article for the Times (Tuesday 12 August 2014, Opinion, page 27). But do you get his … Continue reading


Human Rights in Our Name Clive Hambidge Under international law all parties involved in a conflict, must whether state or non state armed actors, respect international humanitarian law. The aim of which is to regulate conduct during hostilities and respect … Continue reading

The Military Industrial Complexity

The Military Industrial Complexity
Clive Hambidge

(Part 1)

“Congress shall make no law … abridging … the right of the people peaceably … to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

It is a pernicious fact that “Pentagon contracts awarded in the 2000s have been concentrated in the hands of just five contractors- Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and General Dynamics. These five companies account for over one-third of all Pentagon contracts.” And are accountable for countless deaths in foreign lands waging illegal wars.

I’ve taken the scandals involving Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman, as examples of bad practice and alleged/proven criminality to illustrate the undermining of the spirit of the Constitution and the “ordination” of the American people to uphold the moral and ethical values of the Constitution.

The “offences” directly affect the perception of American taxpayer ever aware of the dollar in their pockets and their inherent dignity. Private contractors have been increasingly the killers on the killing fields of Afghanistan and Iraq and private intelligence companies providing the Intel.

Journalist Tim Shorrock: “U.S. officials confirmed that 70 percent of the U.S. intelligence budget goes directly to private companies working under contract to the CIA, the NSA, and other agencies. With the U.S. intelligence budget estimated at $60 billion a year, the outsourced business of intelligence is a $45 billion annual industry.” Think Lockheed Martin and their relationship with the CIA and make the obvious connections.

Northrop Grumman: “The company was sued in 1999 for allegedly knowingly giving the Navy defective aircraft. This suit seeks $210 million in damages and is ongoing. Then in 2003, the company was sued for allegedly overcharging the U.S. government for space projects in the 1990s. Northrop Grumman paid $111.2 million to settle that suit out of court. “From August 25 through September 2, 2010, Virginia,s computer operations experienced a week-long computer outage. Northrop Grumman operated these systems under a $2.4 billion contract. As a result, as many as 45,000 citizens could not renew their drivers licenses prior to their expiration. Computer systems for 26 of the state’s 89 agencies were affected and Governor Bob McDonnell announced that some data may be permanently lost. Northrop Grumman has apologized for the outage and will fund an investigation. Northrop Grumman had contributed approximately $75,000 to McDonnell’s campaign.” Moreover, “The company has also established a military communicty of practice, a companywide team of Talent Acquisition professionals who meet regularly to share information, experiences, and leading practices for recruting, networking and hiring of transitioning military personnel.”

Boeing: “Instances of Boeing’s wrongdoing involved major offences against the U.S government and U.S taxpayers … involving theft of a competitors proprietary data … Boeing acquired 25,000 pages of bidding documents from its sole competitor, Lockheed Martin.”

Lockheed Martin: “CorpWatch made plain that Lockheed Martin, The world’s #1 military contractor, responsible for the U-2 and SR-71 spy planes, F-16, F/A-22 fighter jet, and Javelin missiles.” have made “millions through insider trading, falsifying accounts, and bribing officials.”

Also: “According to the Arms Trade Resource Center, Lockheed Martin gets $105 from each U.S. taxpayer and $228 from each U.S. household. In 2002 the company was effectively taxed at 7.7% compared to an average tax rate for individuals of 21-33%.”

Lockheed Martin is also not adverse to paying bribes to gangsters, paying known gangster “Yakuza Chief Kodama Yoshio $2.1 million in payoffs to help them sell their new wide-bodied passenger airplane, the TriStar L1011, against stiff competition from Boeing and McDonnell-Douglas.”

Lockheed Martin “does work for more than two dozen government

agencies from the Department of Defence and the Department of Energy to the Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency. It’s involved in surveillance and information processing for the CIA, the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the National Security Agency (NSA), the Pentagon, the Census Bureau, and the Postal Service.”

This a company that in the 1990’s bought Datacom Inc turning it into Lockheed Information Services (IMS) then, in turn, “IMS managed to win contracts in 44 states and several foreign countries for tasks ranging from collecting parking fines and tolls to tracking down “deadbeat dads” and running “welfare to work” job-training programs. The result was a number of high profile failures, but hey, you can’t do everything right, can you?”(William D. Hartung)

The question is do the people of the United States recognize the implications of their individual and collective right to a sacred awareness of the American Constitution as follows: “We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” Do they further recognize as a “grievance” the behavior of the corporate, military, and political elites? And then to whom -considering the range and breadth of the corruption- do they petition in assurance of a just therefore transparent process and outcome, where the constitution and U.S democracy is strengthened.

The growing surveillance culture can only undermine civil liberties which pro-actively work against a “more perfect union” “domestic Tranquility” and “Blessings of liberty” because a surveillance society breeds suspicion and distrust of the other. Accountability walks hand in hand with an independent judiciary, the willingness of the whistleblower and the wider public to hold corporations and the government to account, thus restoring, though not in an absolutist sense, the imperatives of the Constitution, and the sovereignty of the U.S. Citizen.

This corporate connivance, unethical and often criminal, short changes the American public and undermines their freedoms. Beware America and petition your leaders for greater transparency in corporate government interactions. And remember: “The Constitution of the United States Is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times and under all circumstances.” (United States Supreme court in Ex parte Milligan [1866])

Take it as your moral ethical guide and act. “Recognizing that the essential rights of man are not derived from ones being a national of a certain state, but are based upon the attributes of the human personality, and that they therefore justify international protection in the form of a convention reinforcing or complementing the protection provided by the domestic law of the American states” (American Convention On Human Rights “Pact of San Jose, Costa Rica” (B-32) ).

Clive Hambidge is Human Development Director at Facilitate Global. Clive can be contacted at This paper can be reproduced but the author and source must be acknowledged in full. Thank you




Questions of Power and Slavery Clive Hambidge “If it’s a neurotic superpower you’re looking for, then America’s your one” Robert Kagen “In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief … Continue reading

Iyad Rabi

     Appointed Facilitate Global Head of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law,  Iyad Rabi is a well known Palestinian Advocate and international human rights activist, legal adviser and  lecturer.

In his capacity as  Human Rights andInternational Humanitarian Law Consultant  Iyad delivers training to regional and international

Iyad Rabi (2)

institutions to include NGOs as well as a variety of forums and UN agencies.   Iyad’s expertise extends to  minorities’ rights, indigenous people’s rights, international

arbitration, women and children rights awareness, health rights. consumer protection, class action.  international advocacy and networking.   Aside from  his independent activities, he was a co-founder, board member and  executive director of  organisations for human rights, culture and community development.

Iyad  finds Facilitate Global  an effective organisation and looks forward  to contributing his knoweldge, skills and experience to increase worldwide awareness, respect  and commitment to human rights and international humanitarian law. And, with FG’s fruitful team work, he is keen to capacity build with a view to develop more cooperation and networking among human rights organisations and forums worldwide.

Iyad  can be contacted at



 Facilitate Global supports the StopG4S campain. G4S Israel: Intentional Complicity in Acts of Injustice for Profit? Rachael M. Rudolph Is it willful disregard for human rights and disrespect for humanity or the intentional complicity in acts of injustice for profit? … Continue reading


Integrated Education in Northern Ireland  Faysal Mikdadi “Integrated Education is about mutual and common acceptance, especially the acceptance of trying new ideas for the benefit of the central purpose of education: the individual child.” Cliodhna Scott-Wills: Development Officer for Northern … Continue reading


#opGTMO: Justice for Guantanamo and the President of the United States’ Speech Rachael M. Rudolph The following is an articulation of my understanding of the points made by the President of the United States regarding an issue near and dear … Continue reading


 The UN, Integrated Systems & American Intransigence To Accountability Clive Hambidge. Part One Integrated Systems In Wikipedia we find this, concerning an overview of the meaning ‘integrated systems’ “A system is an aggregation of subsystems cooperating so that the system … Continue reading


‘Personal Journeys: The Global Impact of Israel’s Dissenting Voices’ Notes taken by Susan Walpole – Facilitate Global Fundraising Dinner, London, 10 April 2013 These notes are of two brief talks by Miko Peled and Ilan Pappe, followed by a Question … Continue reading


EXCAVATION (Of a Spanish Civil War Atrocity) Kevin Russell-Pavier Back then, there was just an ordinary woman, Standing in the crowd; just a single mother Cradling the ragged bundle of her baby In her arms, letting it suckle at the … Continue reading


In solidarity with all hunger strikers Gauntanamo Bay detention centre is an illegal black hole in which too many civilians have been lingering in limbo. They have been subjected to indefinite detention, cruel and inhuman treatment for over a decade. … Continue reading


Taste Gaza: Laila El-Haddad and Maggie Schmitt Prepare a Dagga Salad Posted on March 31, 2013 by dandelionsalad Dandelion Salad Image by Oxfam International via Flickr lauraflanders·Mar 30, 2013 Co-Authors, Laila El-Haddad and Maggie Schmitt prepare a Dagga Salad and talk … Continue reading




And the land cried tears of blood Soraya Boyd   Heaving with revulsion, the defiled and mutilated land suppurates Bloodied tears borne out of grief inconceivable only inaudible sighs each pang separates   And the mournful stones cry out in … Continue reading